- 相关推荐
十二怒汉观后感英文版（通用8篇）
当观看完一部影视作品后，对人生或者事物一定产生了许多感想吧，为此需要好好认真地写观后感。在写观后感之前，可以先参考范文，以下是小编为大家收集的十二怒汉观后感英文版，仅供参考，欢迎大家阅读。
十二怒汉观后感英文版 1
As a IMDB NO.8 movie, originally only read and when the university language class fuzzy again writing film is a very extravagant things, but this afternoon again like a completely blew my mind, giving too many surprises and things will still lead a person to endless aftertastes, on the next.
Talk before seen a movie, called the man from Earth (the man from the earth), features a proposed very beautiful view or treason and heresy, by constantly review and logical scrutiny to details of other peoples point of view in the opposite direction. The point is that the language of art and clever reasoning, give people the feeling of layers of peeling cocoon. This 12 anger is more in-depth study of human nature and the United States judicial and democratic system.
Originally seemingly incontrovertible case because the jury has an objection, so an amazing negotiations began. The opposition is a smooth and logical architect, and a producer of the film. The first round of the debate is mainly composed of a Its possible! That led, the boy may be innocent, the witness may be wrong, false testimony could, to a 18 year old boy without thinking directly to the electric chair is a be brutal and inhuman. At this stage, the only point against the success of Davis is to let people get away from the surface of the evidence and their own prejudices, with careful scrutiny of the details of the mind, for the next stage to lay the foundation.
In the details of reasoning, Davis has been a breakthrough point and support the knife, when out of pocket knife with almost the same knife, all surprised sound jump, so the evidence will lose credibility, on the knife in the back again to become a breakthrough point. Davis proposed to reproduce the boy murder scenes, so that the boy insisted that the guilty get Davis for demonstration, higher than their own people, manipulation is holding a knife stabbed in the chest from the top down, and from a slum, have seen a lot of people stand up and fight to get stressed such adjustment method, it is a waste of time the tool, familiar boy didnt like this.
To discuss the progress on many of the details in advance, such as time difference; the old man can walk out of the bedroom, through the corridor in 15 seconds, the boy rushed out to see the woman; both sides of the nose mark and kept rubbing surface of the eye is myopic. Although there are set close enough to leave the drama to overthrow the testimony of the suspects, but still very appreciated this insight.
Another wonderful place is a lot of analysis of human nature of the plot, such as the first to support the Davis people to explain why the old man would do the perjury, that is because of a comic book unknown to the public suddenly one day to get attention, others want to refer to his views, and flattered him with long battle, trying to hide myself the lame. It can be said that this is a weakness of human nature, in order to other peoples attention or respect, at the same time distort the facts.
Confrontation and Davis and his resolute opponents, Davis said a press button to personally chair is sadistic, who shouted I will kill rage came forward to beat Davis, you! And Davis were all pulled at him, calmly questions, you dont really want to kill me, right let him have nothing to say?. Clever people to move the stone to hit their feet very exciting, but the more exciting is the director here to give a very clear view, that is, an idiom in china.
From A to Z 3 opponents is not for evil, frowning, talking is intolerable or pessimistic, but strong scream as you want the boy to death immediately said, this man has become a justice in the case when the correct, but when the error is a disaster. How can one be able to act as a judge of the fate of others by letting them have their own prejudices and that they have no prejudice? Only a disregard for human life.
The discussion in the final is firmly opposed to face their own feelings with his photo when collapse over, perhaps the boy really killed my father, but this is a shining glory of human nature of the trial, the greatness of the judicial system reflects the most incisive. Especially with China nearly thousands of years of autocratic centralization comparison, and even become the decision habit, look at a building built not demolished and rebuilt for several years, I can not help worrying, Chinese how many innocent common people Yuansi, how many wise decisions in authoritarian pressure die, many seemingly overweeningly ambitious construction plan also in the pipeline?
十二怒汉观后感英文版 2
This Indoorsman empty and lonely months come out a fart, this essay is moving around the brain exercises, do not take it seriously.
"12 angry men", epee no front, delicate work
About the film itself
Of all the movies Ive seen, "12 fury" is not my favorite top ten, but its definitely the most boring Ive ever seen in the top 10. The whole film is only one scene, 12 men, 1.5 hours of dialogue, or a black and white film. However, it is cattle, cattle cattle, with the most boring way, about the most exciting story.
The whole film is about a murder trial. A bad boy was charged with the murder of his father, hear the voice of the old man across the street downstairs, witnessed the process of womens murder knife, unconvincing alibi, seems to have been placed in the electric chair in front of the child will be. 12 members of the jury will determine the childs life and death, but they have to make a unified ruling, the results can be effective. At the beginning of the film, 11 people think that the child is guilty, only one out of respect for life, that the case pending. After 1.5 hours of hard work, all the evidence is classified as "reasonable doubt", that is to say, there is a reason why it cannot be fully established. The boy was acquitted.
The story itself does not have any complicated place, neither brain nor burning suspense. However, the film, there is a kind of good. This is a typical confined space film, but there is no usually confined space film repression. The plot is fascinating, as if an invisible hand, grabbed in the viewers mind, to promote the development of the plot. Then the hand is hidden very deep, you can only cast a tepid performance, and the degree of relaxation rhythm to feel it. It is difficult to point out that it is in which point, the plot, so that the merits of a step forward. It makes a "mission impossible" completed, but does not show abrupt. Like warm boiled frog, unconsciously, has been the director of the road.
On the confined space of the film, you can take the "12 angry Han" and "sniper phone booth" to do a comparison.
The latter is my personal narrow viewing experience, in recent years considered very good confined space film. It is more intense than the "12 angry Han", more depressed, more popular. However, the latter of the wonderful, is the process of viewing the obvious exciting, the director deliberately for the tension (of course, it is not easy). It will be the hero and the audience, and placed under the gun, like a gun under the deer hunter. Every thought, every action, will determine your life and death. So its hot, hormones are always high.
The former is different, the director will be shot, placed on the spectators point of view, and without any emotional color. Group play is also very difficult to bring the audience into the sense. This kind of calm angle of view, can let a person look at the whole process more calmly. The former is like the slalom, the latter is watching the scenery is better, but also the readers taste.
About humanity
The director cut the case in the form of a jury, but also brought another narrative convenience, no matter what kind of decisions made by the 12 angry men, will not have any impact on their own, they are bystanders. Moreover, the restriction of 12 people, a persons decision, the role of both large and small. This is like 100 thousand people pulling the hair of a person, everyone will think, he pulled out a hair of others will produce what kind of impact on the people, but when tenth million individuals pulled over the last hair, who is responsible for this thing? The individual in the collective judgment, are more likely to get a sense of security even moral, ah q would say, I feel the monk can not be touched? As a result, the only thing that can restrain the 12 anger is the moral of the individual, respect for life, the fear of the law, and the American dream of American pride. However, it is for the respect of other peoples lives, the value of the personal status of citizens, can better reflect the reason why the "social man" noble.
On Jurisprudence
11:1, does not represent the overwhelming victory, the minority to the majority, also did not see so reasonable. Let a few people speak freely, is a fair basis.
十二怒汉观后感英文版 3
"The twelve fury", a black and white film that was shot in the 50s of the last century, still holds the top spot in the list of legal films. The filming of the film is now still seems to be very good or even fresh, a jury of twelve people to discuss the scene occupies the vast majority of the film. The basic circumstances of the case is almost a convicted juvenile patricide after the trial requires twelve man jury made unanimous verdict. Finally, after a long and bitter debate, the kind of people in the aura of human nature under the leadership of the hero to the boy to freedom.
A movie is great, it must be that it allows everyone to find their own interpretation and indirect exposure to real life. What does the film say? The responsibility of the rights and obligations of unity, American judicial system, "would rather let ten thousand can not kill the wrong one" judicial policy on human, fine, deep dig of character psychology analysis, inference of life precious goodness of life, respect, in the face of adversity to find a breakthrough in the actual combat skills, logical reasoning method and so on. Among them, my most shocking is the jury in the system of human feelings and legal justice in the game between the precise performance of the game.
First of all, from the significance of the establishment of the jury system. As everyone knows, the jury system is a more common in the countries of Anglo American law system for the realization of democracy and set up the court ruling, but in this case is obviously that consisting of 6-12 people, a case of a group, decide whether the defendant guilty of petty jury. The task of the jury is to find the truth, to seek the defendants heart, to judge whether the law is fair, and to fight against the dictatorship and oppression of the government. Judging from the case, twelve different personalities, different origins of the jury finally completed this sacred mission, although the process is full of hardships and disputes, although meager pay.
Obviously, the jury system establishment greatly to the "people" will have reflected the way, representative of the first throw to the "people" problems, from the set goal, one of the ways of expression also embody the will of the consciousness of law. This movie is a result to the satisfaction of all, "peoples democracy" successful practice, worthy of praise.
It can be said that this kind of non professional, only the simple way to judge the feelings of law to a certain extent reflects the demographic characteristics and values of a society, naturally has a natural rationality and institutional affinity. This kind of justice can make the majority of the people in this society to be convinced, and not like the law of the general cold ruthless, the decision was also less likely to be overturned. This is also the system from the Anglo Saxon era has been widely used and today there are still many reference reasons.
The next step is to discuss whether the justice based on human judgment is the justice required on the legal balance.
In the movie "Twelve Angry Men", each juror all have some worry, anxious to help their own work and entertainment, because of some emotional problems naturally to the case of the boy off, some because of hot weather to escape from the narrow discussion room...... All these practical problems are unable to avoid or even to be taken into account when the jury system is set up. But this is real life. As the most common people, the jury will be influenced by all kinds of personal and environmental factors.
A great movie is that it takes all kinds of factors affecting the justice of Law -- or clear or vague to show in front of the audience, the audience from the heart to feel, if oneself is in jury, it is very difficult to guarantee that complete justice. Just one example, in seemingly irrefutable evidence, even lawyers are too lazy to defend for the boy, the judge is also a lazy way, that will make everyone believe: the child First impressions are strongest had killed his father and have to pay the price to be sent to the chair in the end has not yet started life. That is why there is a big gap between 11 and 1, which is likely to have an impact on the environment.
It is a little question although it is difficult to have a keen insight into matters but people-oriented "actor has been discussed by expanding, finally let more and more jurors tend to believe that the boy innocence. But this calm person in reality is very rare, if we depend on every case in each group the jury can have a "hero" to calm to control, it is not realistic! As one of the judges in the film said to himself, "its a little bit of a heart attack" if its a long time to change into another jury. Just imagine, as a result, the jury system has become a kind of terrible, if the jury random selection will lead to two completely different results for the case even for a young life and death, let the life in the legal system of the people and how to maintain adequate sense of security and justice of law faith?
So I think that any system has its own defects, the rationality of its existence and its inevitable, certainly not in personal feelings or political stance over highly or completely system, the disadvantages and system optimization is the right path of human progress. It may also be a more than half an hour to convey the meaning of the film more far-reaching.
Finally, it is worth mentioning that the opening and the end of the film is very interesting, with the film language.
十二怒汉观后感英文版 4
"12 Angry Men" is a cinematic masterpiece that delves deep into the human psyche and the justice system. The film, set entirely in a jury room, follows the deliberations of twelve jurors as they decide the fate of a young man accused of murder.
What struck me most about this movie is the power of doubt. Initially, eleven jurors are convinced of the defendants guilt, ready to send him to the electric chair without a second thought. However, Juror 8, played brilliantly by Henry Fonda, refuses to conform. He plants the seed of doubt, not because he believes the boy is innocent, but because he believes in the importance of a fair trial. This simple act of dissent sets off a chain reaction, forcing the other jurors to reexamine the evidence and their own biases.
The film also highlights the influence of personal experiences and prejudices on decision - making. Each juror brings their own baggage into the room, whether its a strained relationship with their own son, a deep - seated racial bias, or a desire to get the deliberation over quickly. These biases cloud their judgment and make it difficult for them to see the truth objectively. It is only when they are forced to confront these biases that they begin to consider the possibility of the defendants innocence.
"12 Angry Men" is a powerful reminder of the importance of due process and the role of the jury in upholding justice. It shows that even in the face of overwhelming evidence, one persons doubt can make a difference. This movie is not just about a trial; its about the power of human conscience and the fight for justice.
十二怒汉观后感英文版 5
After watching "12 Angry Men", I was deeply impressed by its exploration of group dynamics within the context of the justice system. The jury room becomes a microcosm of society, where different personalities, beliefs, and values collide.
The initial unanimity of the eleven jurors for a guilty verdict is a classic example of groupthink. They are quick to accept the prosecutions case, relying on the seemingly straightforward evidence presented in court. Juror 8s dissent disrupts this equilibrium. His calm and rational approach gradually chips away at the jurors preconceived notions.
The interactions between the jurors are fascinating to watch. There are the hot - headed ones, like Juror 3, whose personal vendetta against his own son colors his view of the defendant. Then there are those who are more easily swayed, like Juror 9, an elderly man who initially goes along with the majority but later finds the courage to stand up for what he believes. The film shows how the groups opinion can be shaped by individual arguments, emotions, and the need for social acceptance.
Moreover, the movie emphasizes the significance of the justice systems reliance on the collective judgment of ordinary people. The jurors, despite their flaws, are responsible for determining a young mans life. This responsibility is not taken lightly by some, while others brush it aside. "12 Angry Men" serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of being vigilant and thoughtful when making decisions that can have life - changing consequences.
十二怒汉观后感英文版 6
"12 Angry Men" is a compelling film that exposes the insidious nature of prejudice and its impact on the pursuit of justice. The story unfolds in a stuffy jury room, where twelve men are tasked with deciding the guilt or innocence of a young Hispanic man accused of killing his father.
Throughout the film, it becomes clear that many of the jurors carry deep - seated prejudices. Some jurors are quick to judge the defendant based on his race and socioeconomic background. They assume that because he comes from a poor neighborhood, he is more likely to be a criminal. Juror 10, in particular, makes several derogatory remarks about the defendants ethnic group, highlighting the racial biases prevalent in society.
However, as the deliberations progress, the power of reason and empathy begins to break down these barriers. Juror 8, through his patient and logical arguments, forces the other jurors to look beyond their prejudices and consider the evidence objectively. He challenges them to see the defendant as a human being, not just a stereotype.
The movie serves as a powerful reminder that prejudice can cloud our judgment and lead to miscarriages of justice. It calls on viewers to be aware of their own biases and to approach decision - making with an open mind. By highlighting the struggle against prejudice within the jury room, "12 Angry Men" has a broader message about the need for social change and the importance of treating all individuals fairly, regardless of their background.
十二怒汉观后感英文版 7
"12 Angry Men" is a thought - provoking film that showcases the power of the individual in the face of a collective decision. The plot centers around a jurys deliberation, where the initial consensus is a guilty verdict, but one jurors dissenting voice changes the course of events.
Juror 8s decision to stand alone against the majority is a powerful statement. He represents the idea that one persons conviction can have a profound impact on a group. His unwavering belief in the importance of a fair trial, even when faced with the hostility of the other jurors, is inspiring. As the deliberations continue, his arguments gradually sway the opinions of the others, not through force, but through the power of reason.
The film also shows how the individuals voice can bring hidden biases and assumptions to the surface. Each juror has their own reasons for their initial stance, and as they are forced to defend their positions, their true motives become clear. This process of self - discovery and the challenge to the groups mindset is a crucial aspect of the movie.
In a society where conformity often prevails, "12 Angry Men" reminds us of the importance of standing up for what we believe in. It shows that even in the most challenging circumstances, one person can make a difference and that the pursuit of truth and justice requires the courage to question the status quo.
十二怒汉观后感英文版 8
Watching "12 Angry Men" was an eye - opening experience that made me reflect deeply on the justice system. The movie presents a critical examination of how the jury system functions and the potential flaws within it.
The jurors in the film are a diverse group of individuals, each with their own set of values and beliefs. This diversity is both a strength and a weakness of the jury system. On one hand, it allows for a variety of perspectives to be considered. On the other hand, it also means that personal biases and emotions can influence the decision - making process.
The film highlights the importance of thorough deliberation. The initial rush to convict the defendant without a proper examination of the evidence is a concerning aspect. It shows that the justice system relies heavily on the jurors ability to set aside their personal feelings and focus on the facts. However, as the jurors in the movie discover, this is easier said than done.
Moreover, "12 Angry Men" raises questions about the role of the prosecution and defense in presenting a balanced case. The jurors are left to piece together the truth from the evidence presented, which may be incomplete or misleading. This calls for a more vigilant and accountable justice system. Overall, the movie serves as a powerful reminder of the need for continuous improvement in the pursuit of justice.
【十二怒汉观后感英文版】相关文章：
电影《十二怒汉》经典台词11-01
精选十二怒汉观后感12-02
十二怒汉观后感英文08-23
十二怒汉观后感英语08-27
十二怒汉观后感时光网10-08
电影十二怒汉观后感600字07-07
梁实秋：怒10-23
教你健康泄怒 五步泄怒法07-26
有关于怒的作文08-01